L'appétit pour le risque n'est pas une feuille de calcul, c'est une conversation

Every company has a risk appetite statement.
Almost no one uses it.

It lives in a Word doc. Maybe it was reviewed by the board once. Maybe it got pasted into a framework presentation. And then… it vanished. Quietly ignored. Pulled out again once a year for the sake of “alignment.”

And that’s the problem. We treat risk appetite like a formality when it should be a tool.

It’s Not the Statement. It’s the Silence.

The statement itself isn’t useless. But when it’s locked away from day-to-day operations, its value drops to zero.

If frontline managers don’t know what it says…
If risk owners don’t use it to prioritize…
If auditors can’t reference it in their planning…

Then it’s not guiding anything. It’s just sitting there.

Risk Appetite Is a Living Thing

Done right, risk appetite isn’t a document. It’s a shared understanding.

It shapes how decisions are made. It gives people guardrails. It informs tradeoffs. It helps teams know when to escalate and when to proceed with confidence.

But for that to happen, it needs to be:

  • Translated into clear thresholds and tolerances
  • Visible inside risk assessments, decisions, and dashboards
  • Discussed regularly (not just during annual reviews)
  • Contextualized for different parts of the business

Where It Goes Wrong

Risk appetite goes stale when it’s:

  • Written only for regulators, not for operators
  • Too high-level to apply to real decisions
  • Disconnected from key workflows and risk ratings
  • Locked in a spreadsheet no one opens

Most teams don’t ignore it because they don’t care, they ignore it because it doesn’t help.

Making Risk Appetite Useful Again

1. Bring it into the platform
Risk appetite should live inside your GRC system. Make sure it’s embedded into assessments, dashboards, and workflows where people are already working.

2. Break it down
A high-level tolerance isn’t actionable. Translate your risk appetite into specific thresholds, by risk type, process, or domain. Then take it to the next level and connect it to scoring logic and decision-making gates.

3. Use it to escalate, not punish
Make it a tool for smart escalation, not a trap for post-mortem blame. When people cross a threshold, it should be an early warning, not a late-stage finding.

4. Talk about it
Review risk appetite in planning meetings. Reference it in board decks. Use it to challenge assumptions and frame strategic decisions. That’s how it stays relevant.

Clarity Beats Compliance

You don’t need a perfect statement – you need a working one.

The goal isn’t to impress regulators. It’s to help your teams act with clarity, confidence, and consistency. And that starts by turning risk appetite from a spreadsheet into a conversation.


Need help operationalizing your risk appetite across teams and workflows? Let’s talk.

Cet article vous plaît ?

Courriel
Partager sur Facebook
Partager sur LinkedIn
Partager sur XING

Parler à un expert

"Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués par un astérisque(*)

Vous cherchez du soutien ?

Si vous recherchez une assistance produit, veuillez vous connecter à notre centre d'assistance en cliquant ici.

Tout d'abord, quel est votre nom ?*
Ce champ est utilisé à des fins de validation et ne doit pas être modifié.

Soumettre une demande de prix

"Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués par un astérisque(*)

Tout d'abord, quel est votre nom ?*
Ce champ est utilisé à des fins de validation et ne doit pas être modifié.

Soumettre une demande d'appel d'offres

"Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués par un astérisque(*)

Tout d'abord, quel est votre nom ?*
Quelle est la solution pour laquelle votre appel d'offres demande une réponse ?*
Déposez vos fichiers ici ou
Types de fichiers acceptés : pdf, doc, docx, Taille maximale du fichier : 1 MB, Nombre maximal de fichiers : 4.
    Ce champ est utilisé à des fins de validation et ne doit pas être modifié.
    Skip to content